Edukey

Archive for July, 2007

Parents Are Flummoxed by their Children’s Homework

Thousands of parents are hiding a guilty secret. They are often completely baffled by their children’s homework. Six out of 10 admitted they struggled to answer their youngster’s questions in a recent study

One in five adults admitted they thought their children were smarter than they were and one in three said they spent an hour a week on the internet or reading books just to keep up with their children’s education…

It comes as Ofsted, the education watchdog, said grandparents should be encouraged to help out in schools to improve grades, because so many parents are working full-time.

But a parent’s grasp of general knowledge is hardly better than their childrens’, an accompanying test revealed…

Source: Daily Mail
http://tinyurl.com/32r6s3

21 July, 2007. 6:15 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

The Best Way to Reduce Childhood Obesity

Numerous studies have shown that a bigger contributor to childhood obesity isn’t the amount of junk food advertisements children are exposed to, but the amount of television they watch. One 2003 study concluded that children who watch three or more hours of television a day are 50 percent more likely to be obese than kids who watch fewer than two hours and that “more than 60% of overweight incidents can be linked to excess TV viewing.” Another found that in “12- to 17-year-old adolescents, the prevalence of obesity increased by 2% for each additional hour of television viewed.”

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, when you include videos, DVD’s, and other prerecorded shows, children watch about four hours of television a day. Times that by seven days a week and that means kids, on average, are spending slightly more than an entire day in front of the boob tube. The amount of television viewed shouldn’t come as a complete surprise considering the average home now has more televisions (2.73) than people (2.55) and one third of children as young as six have a television in their bedroom.

With the copious amounts of television being watched in American households, is it any wonder kids are becoming fat?

The solution to the growing obesity problem doesn’t involve government advertising regulations or lawsuits against the junk food companies but, quite simply, better parenting…

Sadly, most kids probably get their television viewing habits from their parents. Those who watch a lot of television are probably most likely to have parents who also watch a lot of television. Part of getting kids off the couch and involved in more physical and meaningful activities may include getting their television-addicted parents doing something as well…

Source: Blogcritics.org
href=”http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/07/20/112724.php

21 July, 2007. 6:10 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

Just Say NO

Parents must rediscover the N-word or risk raising confused children with no self-control

No. One of the shortest, easiest, most used words in the English language. It can also be one of the hardest to utter in any meaningful way – particularly if you are a modern parent. Those who work with children believe that a generation of parents have forgotten how to say no, with the result that as their children grow up they lack the self-control needed to negotiate adult life successfully.

“Children need to have the experience of an adult saying no,” says Jane Cassidy of the Association of Child Psychotherapists and joint chair of the Child and Adolescent Psychotherapist Division of the Tavistock Society. “If you always give in, they don’t learn that somebody can stay firm, so when they become young teenagers and adults they don’t have the capability to say no to themselves when they are under peer pressure in terms of drugs, delinquency or sex.” The problem, teachers, psychologists and parents agree, is that when it comes to discipline, parents are hopelessly ill-disciplined. They tell their children that they should not do something or cannot have something that they want, but cave in to the child’s protests.

Dr Tanya Byron, clinical psychologist and Times2 columnist, says that dealing with this issue has become “the spine of my clinic. The majority of people I see really can’t say no to their children or can’t set boundaries. They can’t follow through to a consequence after saying ‘no’. Children don’t have a sense of who is in charge so they take charge themselves.”

The effect of parental ineffectiveness is all too obvious in society – nowhere more so than in schools. Earlier this year I spent a week at Banbury School, a comprehensive in Oxfordshire, shadowing the head teacher, Dr Fiona Hammans, a dynamic and nationally respected teacher who has been responsible for the education and wellbeing of thousands of children. She had no doubts about where many of the school’s discipline problems originated.

“You’ve got a generation of parents that does not believe in punishing their kids. They say ‘you’re grounded for a year’. And the kid cries and then they say ‘Oh all right, then!’ A whole lot of parents don’t know how to control their kids. The kids are in charge.” Hammans certainly does know how to say no, and back it up. But her point was that what she said was far less important than what parents said and did. Hammans even described the extraordinary situation where parents were not attending parent-teacher evenings because “kids don’t want their parents coming up here”.

Jane Cassidy says that much of the rot set in relatively recently with “the whole idea of positive affirmation: trying to say yes, trying to avoid saying “no” to children because of the negativity”. Byron concurs, saying that our collective failure with the no word is a “huge change” from the situation when she first started working in the field 18 years ago. One of the chief reasons for this change, she believes, is that in the hurly-burly of the modern world we don’t want to spend what precious time we have with our children acting tough.

“We are very busy. In a lot of families where there are two parents, both work and they don’t want to come home at night and have to tell the children what to do. Or they are too bloody knackered to follow through with the discipline and so say ‘fine, do that, eat that’.” Food is one of the key battlegrounds. “Children have the most restricted diets because parents seem incapable of not giving in to what children want.” But according to Andrea Clifford-Poston, author of When Harry Hit Sally, by saying no to your children you are helping them to learn “not only that there are boundaries between you and them, but also how to put boundaries around themselves and other people”. Saying no, she explains, helps children to learn who we can say no to, when we can say no, why to say no and when we can stop saying no.

“If your children are going to have a good life, then they need to understand some of the rules about human beings being together,” she writes.

“If your child has learnt in the early years that you are someone who has clear and firm ideas about how you expect them to behave, and mean what you say and say what you mean, but don’t withdraw your love when your child has made a mistake, then you have built a solid foundation for the more complex years to come.”

Byron believes that the increasing isolation of parents is a crucial factor in how control over children has eroded. “Extended families don’t exist in the way that they used to and so many parents lack the wisdom and support of the older generation.” She also believes that parents feel under pressure to be seen to be raising well-behaved kids. “Parents are anxious not to be seen with unhappy children, so they negotiate and cajole in any way possible to avoid tantrums.

“We have forgotten what it is to be children. It is acceptable to have temper tantrums. Young children are supposed to be defiant. It’s in the job description. They are learning the rules of the game. Let them have a tantrum. Eventually they will learn that when you say ‘no’ it means ‘no’.”

Then there is the modern, highly risky need to be friends with our children. I recently received the following e-mail lament from a friend, a mother of two. “Parents have this warped view of parenting,” she wrote. “They don’t really want to be parents. They want to be down with their kids, to be popular with them. That’s why you have these scenarios of parents picking fights with teachers and encouraging children to do the same: the teachers are the enemy, the boring/repressive authority figures. That’s also why you see parents dressing the same as kids. I am forever seeing families in Wagamama, boy and dad in boardshorts, Converse and logo T-shirts, mum and girl in combats, Crocs and logo T-shirts. The thinking has to be: ‘We are too young and with it to be bossy authority figures, aren’t we? Better to be MATES with the kids and listen to the same music and watch Doctor Who together or fight over the PlayStation.’ I am surrounded by people who seem to treat parenting as a popularity contest. The thought of their child disliking them, however briefly, is very frightening.”

Cassidy agrees: “A lot of parents just want their children to like them. There’s nothing wrong with that but a lot of parents seem to think that you can negotiate with children. You can’t negotiate with a two-year-old. They don’t have the cognitive skills we have. Sometimes you have to get to the point where you say ‘because I told you so and I’m daddy and that’s just the way it is’. You can take time to explain but they have to understand that when you say no, you mean no. They need rules and consequences. They have to learn that if dad says no to something and they still do it, something will happen that they won’t like.”

Or as a friend who is a child psychologist likes to put it: “No negotiation with terrorists.” Cassidy says that parents’ behaviour is often confused by their own childhood experiences. “For example, if they hated school and a child expresses concerns about going to school, the parents’ feelings become muddled up in the child’s feelings.” Her basic strategy for parents who have lost control is to focus on what aspect of the behaviour they want most to change. “If they think that everything is going wrong, they need to start with the worst problem. So you might say ‘we are going to stop the hitting’ and state what the consequences will be for the child if they continue. They get a warning, they know what is going to happen and then if it continues, you remove a toy. But it is important that the consequence is something the child cares about. Parents say ‘I can’t stop him going to football because that’s what he really loves’, but that’s the whole point. It has to make sense, and then you can have a lot of fun with children once you know what the rules are. Children like knowing what the rules are.”

Byron suggests that where many parents go wrong is in their attitude to dealing with unruly behaviour: “It’s not about discipline, it’s about respect. Parents don’t want their kids to hit but they smack them, which I think is bonkers. They don’t want them to shout or scream, but they shout or scream at them. We should be role models.”

Cassidy agrees that actions speak louder than words: “Children don’t necessarily listen to words. You can say ten times ‘I love you’ but if you are not there they don’t feel they are important.”

It may sound funny coming from professionals, but both Byron and Cassidy believe that one of the burdens for parents is that they are presented with too much information. Byron feels this so strongly that her next book on children will be her last. “A lot of parents feel overloaded by information and disempowered,” she says. “We have got to get to a situation where parents feel empowered to do what they want to do. That may be something that an expert says, but you can do whatever you want as long as it works for you.”

Cassidy says that it is unhelpful for parents to think that there is a right or a wrong way of doing things. “I try to talk to parents about what their instinctive sense of parenting is. They need to have a confidence in themselves and their own sense of authority. If there was a totally right way, there would only be one book, there wouldn’t be hundreds and hundreds of books. We are all different.”

These are encouraging words for parents. The ‘yes’ generation should be able to learn to say ‘no’ again. But as any parent knows, it’s not what you say, but the way that you say it. And say it. And say it. And say it . . .

Source: Times Online
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article2104481.ece

20 July, 2007. 8:05 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

Three Things We Can Learn from Comparing the Chinese and American Education Systems

A nation of engineers vs. a nation of slackers? According to popular belief, Chinese students ace all of the international tests while American students rank near the bottom with countries we have never heard of. The obvious conclusion, to these naysayers, is that the American schools are inferior to Chinese schools.

Certainly, there are differences between Chinese and American education. The most obvious difference is sheer numbers. China has about 200 million primary and secondary students compared to 50 million in the United States. Another is class size. The typical Chinese classroom has 50-60 students, even at the elementary level and especially outside major metropolitan areas. Finally, the teaching methods and emphases in China are different from those in the United States. Despite these differences, hundreds of hours of observations in Chinese and American classrooms ranging from kindergarten to college tell us that these two systems have a lot to teach each other.

We think that China can learn at least two things from American education. First, Chinese classrooms should be more student-centered and involve more active learning. The traditional Chinese classroom is teacher-centered where the teacher is like a movie actor and the students are the audience. The teacher presents information while the students listen quietly and intently. However, in the United States, the teacher is like a movie director and the students work as actors, sometimes even as co-directors…

Second, Chinese education needs to pay more attention to skill training and the real-world application of knowledge. Chinese students have an amazing ability to memorize a huge amount of information and solve problems from a book. This skill serves them well in the test-driven culture that dominates education in China. But, Chinese students don’t develop the creativity needed to be innovators…

Americans shouldn’t get smug because there are also things to be learned from China. First, American education should focus on building a mastery of core concepts, especially in math and science classes. Biology, chemistry, physics, algebra and geometry are required for high school graduation in China. In addition, textbooks, curriculum and teacher training are based on national standards in China…

In the United States, even though different academic disciplines have their own sets of national standards, they are not adopted, tested or integrated into teacher education programs nationwide. Second, schools in America cover too many concepts with too little depth. Compared to their Chinese counterparts, American teachers and students know a little about a lot of topics but not as much about the few important topics. Finally, students in China spend nearly twice as many hours studying as students in the United States

Source: Daily Record
http://tinyurl.com/2agg2c

19 July, 2007. 7:35 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

Chinese Lawyer Calls for Establishment of Child Protection Agent

A Chinese lawyer is calling for the government to establish an organization to protect children from domestic violence after the recent exposure of several child abuse cases.

“An organization should be established to identify family violence against minors and advocate for minors,” said Zhang Haixia, a vice director of child protection with the Shenzhen Lawyers Association Wednesday.

On July 3, a two-year-old girl in Shenzhen was kicked to death by her mother after she vomited milk on bedsheet. In May, a three-year-old girl in Zhengzhou was beaten to death by her parents for her poor speech.

The parents of both girls admitted they had always beaten the girls when they thought they were “naughty”.

China’s newly-amended Law on Protection of Minors had taken effect on June 1. The law clearly stipulates family violence against children is prohibited…

Traditionally, Chinese parents believe the discipline of so-called naughty children by beating is a parental right. Nowadays, more Chinese parents preferred conversation or other means to educate their children…

Source: People’s Daily Online
http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/6218570.html

19 July, 2007. 7:11 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

Pediatric Ritalin Use May Affect Developing Brain

Use of the attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) drug Ritalin by young children may cause long-term changes in the developing brain, suggests a new study of very young rats by a research team at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City.

The study is among the first to probe the effects of Ritalin (methylphenidate) on the neurochemistry of the developing brain. Between 2 to18 percent of American children are thought to be affected by ADHD, and Ritalin, a stimulant similar to amphetamine and cocaine, remains one of the most prescribed drugs for the behavioral disorder.

“The changes we saw in the brains of treated rats occurred in areas strongly linked to higher executive functioning, addiction and appetite, social relationships and stress. These alterations gradually disappeared over time once the rats no longer received the drug,” notes the study’s senior author Dr. Teresa Milner, professor of neuroscience at Weill Cornell Medical College.

The findings, specially highlighted in the Journal of Neuroscience, suggest that doctors must be very careful in their diagnosis of ADHD before prescribing Ritalin. That’s because the brain changes noted in the study might be helpful in battling the disorder but harmful if given to youngsters with healthy brain chemistry, Dr. Milner says…

One thing was clear: 3 months after the rats stopped receiving Ritalin, the animals’ neurochemistry largely had resolved back to the pre-treatment state.

“That’s encouraging, and supports the notion that this drug therapy may be best used over a relatively short period of time, to be replaced or supplemented with behavioral therapy,” Dr. Milner says. “We’re concerned about longer-term use. It’s unclear from this study whether Ritalin might leave more lasting changes, especially if treatment were to continue for years. In that case, it is possible that chronic use of the drug would alter brain chemistry and behavior well into adulthood.” …

Source: Cornell University
http://news.med.cornell.edu/wcmc/wcmc_2007/07_17d_07.shtml

19 July, 2007. 6:15 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

Potter Hype Is Much Ado about Lowly Standards

“How an ordinary book, a children’s book, is being hyped — every day and every minute — just to get consumers to buy, buy, buy!”

“What book, Old Timer?”

“You know darn well what book. Don’t make me madder than I am. I won’t pronounce the title. It’s already had billions too much publicity. Plus a movie coming out. Can’t anybody but me see the manipulation of the public going on?”

“But is it worth getting into such a lather?”

“We the People are being used! Just to sell books, movie tickets, brand name merchandise. And people who should know better fall for it. Opinion leaders. Alleged advisers on parenting. You’ll see cameras and microphones when the books go on sale — at midnight! This is crowd hysteria, whipped up and commercialized.” …

“So what would you do?”

Warn the public they’re being used. What’s on sale is only a so-so juvenile fiction — not exactly trash but with plots based on magical escapes, wizardry, never-never stuff. What’s a kid going to learn about the real world from that?

“But fairy tales have always been big.”

“Sure, classic storytelling. But also Edgar Allen Poe’s tales, and ‘Tom Sawyer,’ ‘Black Beauty,’ ‘Rip Van Winkle.’ And how about the ‘Arabian Nights,’ the ‘Odyssey,’ Jules Verne’s novels, ‘Treasure Island,’ Tolstoy’s short pieces, ‘Ivanhoe.’ I could go on and on, at a fraction of the price. Or at the library, free…

Source: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
http://tinyurl.com/37h74v

19 July, 2007. 6:05 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

More Working Moms Dream of Going Part-Time

It seems to happen every few months: a new book or study fuels the “Mommy Wars,” the intense debate over whether moms should stay home with the kids or work outside the home. Each time there’s spirited talk, angst, and some guilt from mothers who fear they’re doing the wrong thing.

Now the guilt seems actually tangible. In an eye-catching national survey from the Pew Research Center released last week, full-time working mothers rated themselves slightly lower as parents than those who stay home or work part-time.

And that was even more striking when viewed along with the survey’s primary finding — that fully 60 percent of working mothers now say part-time work is their ideal rather than full-time, compared to 48 percent a decade ago…

For Erica Rubach, a 32-year-old mother of two, the findings weren’t a surprise. A year ago, she felt she couldn’t keep her head above water, though to others her life might have seemed ideal: two young kids and a job she loved as director of marketing and business development at a television station.

“But I knew there just wasn’t room for both in my life,” she says. “It was killing me.”

So she left her job, with its 60-70 hour weeks, and with fellow mother Joani Reisen founded MomSpace, a networking site devoted to matching mothers with services in their communities. The two now work on their own schedules. “Recently Erica’s daughter, Maya, had her birthday, and I said to her, ‘this is the coolest thing,’ says Reisen. ‘You got to spend the day canoeing with your daughter!”

The women count themselves among the ranks of so-called “Mompreneurs,” moms who’ve begun their own parent-oriented businesses to serve other moms plus have the flexibility they need for their own young families. They’ve also given other mothers part-time work; they’ve hired 60 people, mostly women, to sell ads on commission…

Source: CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LIVING/worklife/07/16/part.time.moms.ap/

18 July, 2007. 8:04 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

Just Give Me a Little More Time…

Judging by the many posts about working versus not working that litter the discussion boards of my online parenting forum, Mumsnet, there is no doubt that other mothers are racked with guilt and feel the strain, too

So where are we going wrong? I think the concerns of Mumsnetters are a clue. Dads have always been allowed to work long hours and nobody has worried much.

But now, because it is increasingly taking dual incomes to cope with 21st-century expenses, all of us, including the children, are feeling the strain. Spiralling house prices mean that paying the rent or mortgage, which one income used to be able to handle comfortably, now seems to require two…

Unlike lots of our European neighbours who have adopted more family-friendly flexible working practices, in Britain most decent jobs still require 120 per cent from the people who do them, not the 50 per cent that is all that might be available.

Which is why, of course, there are lots of mums on Mumsnet who’ve chosen to lower their living standards and opt out of the workplace altogether.

Of course they wanted to, and recognised the importance of spending some time with their children and when the choice is either a 70-hour working week and a shedload of “bad mother”-related guilt, or being sidelined by their boss, they chose to spend even more time with their children than they originally bargained for.

But if the option to work part-time is the Holy Grail for mothers, and flexible part-time work is the Holy Grail with knobs on, we need to recognise that we must change the workplace culture to elevate the work-life balance at the expense of just work, and so that part-timers don’t get sidelined.

And to do that we need to encourage dads to be involved, too, because, until they do, I strongly suspect it will be nigh on impossible to make that cultural shift.

So how do we go about changing the culture? The same league table that puts us at the bottom for child-rearing has the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Finland at the top.

These are places where the state supports the commitment of both parents to playing a hands-on role in their children’s lives…

Source: Telegraph.co.uk
http://tinyurl.com/34mouz

18 July, 2007. 7:21 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

Why Are Children Today So Unhappy?

We live in one of the wealthiest, most technologically advanced nations on earth. We’ve had 60 years of peace and prosperity with free education and medical services for all.

Our homes are crammed with labour-saving devices and electronic entertainment that previous generations couldn’t even dream of. Surely our children should be growing happier every year?

Well, no. According to figures released last month, one in ten now suffers from a clinically-recognised mental health problem, and earlier this year a UNICEF report on “childhood well-being” found that out of 21 nations across the developed world, British children are the unhappiest…

We’ve come to believe that 21st century children are different from children in the past - that they can get by with less parental time and attention, skip stages in their development and cope with pressures and emotional burdens children shouldn’t have to cope with.

The brutal truth is that they can’t. Life may have changed enormously over the past few decades, but the human brain evolves much more slowly - in fact, it hasn’t changed since Cro-Magnon times.

All babies are born as little Stone Age babies, and it’s up to their parents - supported by their wider community - to help them towards maturity, gradually equipping them with the inner strength, skills and knowledge they need to live in a complex technological culture…

The “obesity explosion” of recent years shows that society - parents, manufacturers, marketers, even the schools that fed children turkey twizzlers - lost sight of the importance of wholesome food in recent decades.

As for shelter, we’ve confused that with over-protection, keeping children wrapped in cotton wool to keep them “safe”, and thus denying them essential opportunities to learn through real-life experience - actually getting out on their bikes and breathing fresh air.

And in a 24/7 culture, where sleep has been sidelined as electronic entertainment fizzes on throughout the night, children may well be getting less sleep than at any time in human history.

Another essential childhood need is the emotional stability that comes from feeling cared-for and secure.

Tiny babies, who can’t feed or look after themselves, need to know someone is caring for them at all times, and are programmed to recognise and become attached to this “someone” by sight, sound, smell and so on.

The carer therefore needs to be a constant and consistent loving presence in the child’s life.

We’ve comprehensively blown this one by putting so many tiny children into day nurseries, so that both their parents can go out to work and feed the economy rather than the baby.

As children grow older, emotional security is associated with regularity and routine, such as family meals and a familiar bedtime ritual.

Children need adults not only to love them, but to provide regularity and to set and maintain boundaries for their behaviour. So parents have to balance warmth with a degree of firmness…

Children also need to learn communication skills, another essential element in emotional and social development.

This starts from the moment they’re born, and is an important part of the bond with the carer that underpins emotional development.

As parents sing and talk to their babies, they awaken the language instinct wired deep in the human brain and provide the data through which children will learn to speak their mother tongue.

But if adults don’t spend time with their children, communication skills won’t develop as they should - and, in a busy modern world, many parents aren’t available to play their part in this process.

Many children now spend the majority of their day in institutional care…

Ironically, in a world where there are more ways to communicate than ever before, parents communicate less and less with their own children.

There’s one other absolutely vital ingredient if children are to grow strong in body and mind - one that, to the great concern of developmental psychologists, is being practically eradicated from many children’s lives.

They need to play. What’s more, they need to play in a relaxed, unstructured way, preferably outdoors with other children and - as they grow older - away from the eagle eyes of the adults…

Human children develop physical control and co-ordination through running, jumping, climbing, skipping or kicking a football around.

They gain first-hand experience of the world they’re going to live in by making mud-pies or paddling in puddles or messing about in a sandpit, riding a home-made go-kart or climbing a tree…

Sue Palmer’s book Toxic Childhood: How the Modern World is Damaging Our Children and What We Can Do About It is published by Orion Books.

Source: Daily Mail
http://tinyurl.com/269wva

17 July, 2007. 8:56 AM. Link | Comments: No Comments »

Blog Categories

Recent Posts

Monthly Archive

Swiss Concept

Copyright © 2005-2008, Edukey Ltd., All rights reserved.